Prediction of Gail Sherriff vs Natalie Scaramanga Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Sherriff vs N. Scaramanga

Gail Sherriff

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Natalie Scaramanga

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Sherriff 1 - 0 Scaramanga

They have played 2 sets in total, with Gail Sherriff winning 2 and Natalie Scaramanga winning 0. The last match between Gail Sherriff and Natalie Scaramanga was at the Monte Carlo, 05-04-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Gail Sherriff getting the victory 6-0 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Sherriff	1
Scaramanga	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Monte Carlo(04-05-78)

Stats

Gail Sherriff

Natalie Scaramanga

G. Sherriff vs N. Scaramanga H2H Profile

G. Sherriff	Stats	N. Scaramanga
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.29% (531-270)	Career Total W/L	50.00% (3-3)
1	Clay	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Sherriff vs N. Scaramanga Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gail Sherriff has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Natalie Scaramanga has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gail Sherriff, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natalie Scaramanga has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Gail Sherriff has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natalie Scaramanga has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Gail Sherriff has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Natalie Scaramanga winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Gail Sherriff has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 294/105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 116/84). Natalie Scaramanga has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 74% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
Player level: In the last year, Gail Sherriff has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Natalie Scaramanga has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gail Sherriff winning 1 times and Natalie Scaramanga being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gail Sherriff winning 2 and Natalie Scaramanga winning 0.
The last match between Gail Sherriff and Natalie Scaramanga was at the Monte Carlo, 05-04-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Gail Sherriff getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gail Sherriff has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Natalie Scaramanga has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gail Sherriff has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natalie Scaramanga has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Gail Sherriff has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natalie Scaramanga has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Gail Sherriff vs Natalie Scaramanga Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Sherriff vs N. Scaramanga H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Sherriff	Stats	N. Scaramanga
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Sherriff Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Le Havre - 03-12-1990
Q1 Amy Van BuurenA. Van	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
ITF Cava Tirreni - 16-07-1984
R3 Judith WarringaJ. Warringa	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 28-05-1984
Q1 Shelly WalpoleS. Walpole	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-05-1982
R1 Leslie AllenL. Allen	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 25-05-1981
R1 Deborah JevansD. Jevans	L	6-4 7-5	Stats

View All

N. Scaramanga Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 29-05-1978
Q1 Nerida GregoryN. Gregory	L	7-6 3-6 6-1	Stats
Monte Carlo - 05-04-1978
R2 Christiane JolissaintC. Jolissaint	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
R3 Gail SherriffG. Sherriff	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 23-05-1977
Q1 Monica AlvarezM. Alvarez	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q2 Yolanda SumarnoY. Sumarno	W	6-4 6-7 6-2	Stats

View All

G. Sherriff vs N. Scaramanga Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Sherriff	Stats	N. Scaramanga
66.29% (531/270)	YTD Win/Loss	50.00% (3/3)
64.39% (1132/626)	Sets Win/Loss	53.33% (8/7)
56.82% (9099/6916)	Games Win/Loss	50.31% (80/79)
67.86% (19/9)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
73.68% (294/105)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
45.45% (5/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
58.00% (116/84)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
21.83	Average Opponent Rank	50
57.41% (31/23)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
46.67% (14/16)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/2)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
58.27% (81/58)	Futures W/L	50.00% (2/2)
67% (517/774)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (3/6)
25% (1/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
33% (1/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
53% (101/192)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (1/3)
90% (530/478)	1st Set Won, Won Match	75% (4/3)
9% (530/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	25% (4/1)
16% (255/42)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (2/0)